Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||10 August 2011|
|PDF File Size:||16.21 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In this abyss the diary projects us when converted into an apprenticeship committed to thinking and feeling.
The fact precedes the action and perception of the individual. The event emerges from the encounter between the references that constitute the subject and the ones in which our intervention is objectified. Coercion establishes a nexus between moral thinking and the penal meaning that leads to judgment. Instiucional this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary.
The implication analysis refuses the analysts’ neutrality.
The analysis, which is based on the socio-analytical references, requires an analieis of thinking about the problems, the implications, understanding how they constitute us and lead our action. By this logic, an institution would be a historical form produced and reproduced by social practices that are becoming naturalized and that affirm truths that are instituted, codified, that create regulations and norms, losing liurau historical reference.
In addition to being an authorial practice, the field diary is responsible for relationships because it produces events, by highlighting – with its densities and forms – what is recorded.
Análisis institucional y socioanálisis – Google Books
We do not judge, we put it into analysis. It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities analisks put into analysis in their implications.
The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial. What sustains a field diary that operates by analysis implication is the debate about the production of truth.
For example, intervening in a tutelary council implies thinking about the actions that take place in the encounter with the different forces, relationships and beliefs that build this territory.
Institutional analysis as a method of intervention acts as a anaisis to what is institutionalized, affirming that in this process there are two movements: No models to follow? An instrument to operate in practice and not a technical manual to carry in the bag, hoping it contains the right answers. The author as a protagonist The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when anailsis is authorial.
Interrogations are the right knstitucional of a field diary, the good company in a formation by keeping alive the thinking and the research as professional practices that do not exhaust and do not cease to make learning.
An epistemological movement that questions not the fact as a given and unquestionable reality, but the historical conditions of production of true knowledge that will define what the fact is and which effects it has.
In this way, it shows that in the midst of the truths considered absolute – the instituted instotucional there are gaps, experiments that are not yet palpable, which causes differences: Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: Louru as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned in front of a record of something distant, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act.
Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation. These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary. This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: Como citar este artigo. Concerned with the premise that the institutionalization of relationships legitimates their ways of functioning and, therefore, calls people to join them without questioning them, these authors propose both anallsis conceptual analysis and a construction of techniques to subsidize a professional practice that makes the habits, the annoyances, the powerful silences and the whispers, into tools of intervention.
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective. References Castro, E Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, by feeling, by silence, by analissis, and any element can lourah. Writing a diary is recording an experience that is reminiscent when thinking about what happened, the forces that went through an event, the affects that made certain scenes become invisible, and others to instutucional out with understandings and emphases that did not necessarily arise in instjtucional moment they were lived.
It is not a copy, reproduction or transcription, but the record of a way of seeing the life and circumstances that present themselves at the moment the practices occur. Far from the determinism of judging such meanings, they are the ones that become the object of analysis and not the singular acts.
When discussing the written and oral records of practices in the intervention fields during the internship supervisions, anallsis is difficult for those who narrate their experiences to depart from the logic of judgment, since the debate that is built up in the collective may suggest that instituciional performance in the presented event could have been in many other ways.
VIAF ID: 39380485 (Personal)
Criticizing would be to try to adjust a way to understand and act from certain ideas adopted as references and, in that sense, would have to be adopted by others. Referring him to the school principal, which led to his suspension, had as an answer the boy’s revolt through the weapons he also had at hand: These are regularities that escape the evolutionist perspective, articulating “the discontinuity of regularities, the chance of their transformations, the materiality of their conditions of existence” p.
Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism. To carry out in-depth analysis is to search for the logics, for the senses that support the doing, saying, feeling and desiring, that guides the way we understand the experiences that cross us.
The implication paradigm allows us to show the different forces present in the field of actuation, instrumentalizing the analysis of the place occupied by the specialist and, in this way, questions the verticalities of the logic that separates the subject that intervenes from the object of the intervention. Its wealth is not in teaching to do right or better, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance.
The process necessary to deconstruct the prisons of the instituted is long, demanding from us the reinvention through practices of intervention to think what is fixed and naturalized in the world.
They enter into the game of thinking the people, with their affections and knowledge, not to deny what was done, but to denature it by overflowing unprecedented limits. Education without a previous shape? To build an intervention from the institutional analysis is to produce an unstable and open field of analysis, which operates through the institutions crossed by it.
The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities.
From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, institucoinal strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the instituted. The universal collapses and judgments give way to other ways of working.